Draft and get answers inside Word
Saige Assist works in the Microsoft Word add-in — drafting and answering where your legal team already lives.
Your team is already reaching for tools like ChatGPT, Copilot, and Gemini to draft faster — and that's the right instinct. The opportunity is everything around the draft: the approvals, the audit trail, and the institutional context that let you trust AI across every contract, not just one.
Drafting is one step — contracting is the workflow around it
Approvals and audit trails are what make AI safe to scale
Your contract history is context no general model starts with
Watch · 30s
Inside IntelAgree
Saige Assist reads, extracts, and analyzes every contract — inside a governed, auditable workflow.
Most teams are stuck choosing between AI that's ungoverned and software that's inflexible. With IntelAgree, there's a third option.
Short clips from inside IntelAgree — AI review, risk scoring, in-Word drafting, plain-English search, and approval routing, all inside one governed workflow. Tap any clip to play.
Saige Assist works in the Microsoft Word add-in — drafting and answering where your legal team already lives.
Risk is calculated from the formula and attribute weights your team configures — auditable, not a black box.
Out-of-office coverage keeps approvals routing to the right person, so contract workflows never stall.
Search and report across every contract in plain language — grounded in your own agreements, not the open web.
Reminders, approvals, and contract status tracked in one place — the accountability a chat thread can't keep.
A quick tour of AI-native CLM — drafting, review, risk, approvals, and search working as one governed system.
A model can produce language, but contract lifecycle management depends on routing, approvals, obligations, fallback positions, version history, and accountability. A prompt is not a process.
Legal and business teams need to know who approved what, which policies applied, what changed, and whether the right controls were followed. That accountability cannot live in a chat thread.
The best contract decisions depend on prior negotiations, counterparty history, business terms, clause positions, and institutional knowledge that no general-purpose model carries by default.
AI is most useful when it adapts to how teams actually work while still operating inside trusted enterprise processes. Unconstrained flexibility is just risk with a better interface. See related thinking on Saige Assist and our technology approach.
Here's what we hear most often from teams like yours weighing a build vs. buy approach:
Yes, and many teams already do. General-purpose AI like ChatGPT and Copilot can draft and summarize contract language well. The gaps appear at enterprise scale: governance, approval routing, audit trails, compliance enforcement, and the institutional context that spans the full contract lifecycle. Those require workflow architecture, not a better prompt.
Most CLM tools make you build every workflow in advance. IntelAgree's Dynamic Based on User Hierarchy routes approvals per the rules you set per contract type. You set the rules — who approves what, what triggers legal review, what counts as risky — and approvals route through the hierarchy you've defined.
The contracts your team negotiates this year are what make next year's contracts smarter. That history — who approved what, why a fallback was accepted, where a counterparty pushed back — only exists if a system captured it as decisions got made. Better general AI doesn't change that. A more capable model added to your contract folder later can read what you signed, but it can't see the decisions behind it. The thing being built right now, by your team, in your workflows, is the dataset no model can backfill. The earlier you start capturing it, the more valuable it becomes.
It depends on where the contract goes. Pasting agreements into a public, general-purpose chatbot moves sensitive terms outside your controls, with no approval trail and no record of who saw what. IntelAgree runs AI on your contracts inside a governed, access-controlled environment with audit trails, maintained to SOC 2 Type II — so AI can read and draft without the data leaving your controls.
Watch the full replay
AI, Governance, and the Future of CLM
Full webinar replay
Why You're Underusing Your CLM Software (And How To Fix It) · 45 min
We help teams bring AI into CLM with the governance, context, and control enterprise contracting requires.
Let's talk